Difference between revisions of "User talk:Rubyng2004"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | Please review the existence of Category:Percussion 12+ Works | + | Please review the existence of Category:Percussion 12+ Works<br> |
+ | |||
____ | ____ | ||
Dear Ruby: Where I am from, the category exists for people to look for percussion ensemble works for 12 or more players... This is a necessary distinction to allow people to see all the works that include 12 or more player. It doesn't hurt anyone to have multiple ways to sort items. I am fine with keeping sub categories beyond 12 as you have been doing, but we can still have a sub category of all works and composers who have written works for 12 or more players. Thank you for understanding and leaving this category in place. Cheers! | Dear Ruby: Where I am from, the category exists for people to look for percussion ensemble works for 12 or more players... This is a necessary distinction to allow people to see all the works that include 12 or more player. It doesn't hurt anyone to have multiple ways to sort items. I am fine with keeping sub categories beyond 12 as you have been doing, but we can still have a sub category of all works and composers who have written works for 12 or more players. Thank you for understanding and leaving this category in place. Cheers! |
Revision as of 02:10, 21 March 2024
Please review the existence of Category:Percussion 12+ Works
____ Dear Ruby: Where I am from, the category exists for people to look for percussion ensemble works for 12 or more players... This is a necessary distinction to allow people to see all the works that include 12 or more player. It doesn't hurt anyone to have multiple ways to sort items. I am fine with keeping sub categories beyond 12 as you have been doing, but we can still have a sub category of all works and composers who have written works for 12 or more players. Thank you for understanding and leaving this category in place. Cheers!